Amicus brief: Kumho Tire v. Carmichael.

Amicus brief: Kumho Tire v. Carmichael.

Brief Amicus Curiae in Robert Baxter versus State of Montana.

If you get the printed book in on-line book store, you may also find the same problem. So, you must move store to store and search for the available there. But, it will not happen here. The book that we will offer right here is the soft file concept. This is what make you can easily find and get this brief amicus curiae in robert baxter versus state of montana by reading this site. We offer you...

Constitutional Precedent of Amicus Briefs

We investigate shared language between U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions and interest groups’ corresponding amicus briefs. Specifically, we evaluate whether language that originated in an amicus brief acquired legal precedent status by being cited in the Court’s opinion. Using plagiarism detection software, automated querying of a large legal database, and manual analysis, we establish seven...

Adipose tissue macrophages: Amicus adipem?

Chronic overnutrition drives complex adaptations within both professional metabolic and bystander tissues that, despite intense investigation, are still poorly understood. Xu et al. (2013) now describe the unexpected ability of adipose tissue macrophages to buffer lipids released from obese adipocytes in a manner independent of inflammatory macrophage activation.

Further Developments on Previous Symposia the Rhetoric of Neutrality and the Philosophers’ Brief: a Critique of the Amicus Brief of Six Moral Philosophers in Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill

In an amicus brief to the United States Supreme Court in the companion assisted suicide cases of Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill, Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, Thomas Scanlon, and Judith Jarvis Thomson describe themselves as “six moral and political philosophers who differ on many issues of public morality and policy.” Perhaps a distinction exists between ...