AB191. Predictors of conversion from minimally invasive to open adrenalectomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Laparoscopic approaches are routinely used for a variety of procedures in general surgery and various surgical specialties including surgical oncology. Since publication of the first series of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the late 1980s, the field of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has expanded dramatically and is now regarded as an established specialty. Many oncologic procedures have prov...
متن کاملWestern Dietary Pattern Reduced Male Fertility: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
Background: Previous studies have investigated the associations between dietary patterns and male infertility, but found contradictory results. So, this meta-analysis was conducted to examine the association between dietary patterns and male infertility. Methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify the studies over association between dietary patterns and male infertility. The wester...
متن کاملMinimally invasive cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive (MI) cardiac surgery was introduced to reduce problems associated with a full sternotomy. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of minimally invasive cardiac surgery on a range of clinical outcomes. METHODS To identify potential studies (randomised/prospective clinical trials) systematic searches were carried out. The search strategy included the co...
متن کاملthe application of systematic review and meta-analysis concepts in summarizing the findings of observational studies
abstract: in contrast to traditional reviews, systematic reviews explore theliterature on a specific topic comprehensively using a well-defined protocol and recruit the findings of eligible studies after the assessment of their qualities, using a clear and reproducible method. checking the assumptions, we may merge the findings of recruited studies in a systematic review and use metaanalysis te...
متن کاملMinimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Evidence on the benefits of minimally invasive surgery over open procedures in gastrointestinal surgery is continuing to accumulate. This is also the case for esophageal surgery. Esophageal cancer often requires extensive surgery and is, therefore, considered to be one of the most invasive elective gastrointestinal procedures. Clinical studies investigating means to reduce the invasive nature o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Mesentery and Peritoneum
سال: 2020
ISSN: 2616-2725
DOI: 10.21037/map.2020.ab191