A normal criterion concerning zero numbers
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Let $$n \ge 4$$ n ≥ 4 be a positive integer, $$\mathcal {F}$$ F family of meromorphic functions in D and let $$a(z)(\not \equiv 0), b(z)$$ a ( z ) ≢ 0 , b two holomorphic . If, for any function $$f \in \mathcal { F}$$ f ∈ , (1) $$f(z) \ne \infty $$ ≠ ∞ when $$a(z)=0$$ = (2) $$f'(z)-a(z)f^{n}(z)-b(z)$$ ′ - has at most one zero then is normal
منابع مشابه
Normal Criterion Concerning Shared Values
We study normal criterion of meromorphic functions shared values, we obtain the following. Let F be a family of meromorphic functions in a domain D, such that function f ∈ F has zeros of multiplicity at least 2, there exists nonzero complex numbers bf , cf depending on f satisfying i bf/cf is a constant; ii min{σ 0, bf , σ 0, cf , σ bf , cf ≥ m} for some m > 0; iii 1/ck−1 f f ′ k z f z / b f/c ...
متن کاملOrbital Normal Forms for a family of-zero Singularity
Consider a Dynamical system x'=F(x,µ) such that its linear part has a pair of imaginary eigenvalues and one zero eigenvalue (Hopf zero singularity). Recently, the simplest normal form for this singular system has been obtained by sl(2) Lie algebra theory and the decomposition of space into three invariant subspaces. The normal form of this singular system is divided into three general cases. In...
متن کاملA Diophantine Problem concerning Polygonal Numbers
Motivated by some earlier Diophantine works on triangular numbers by Ljunggren and Cassels, we consider similar problems for general polygonal numbers.
متن کاملNormal Numbers Are Normal
A number is normal in base b if every sequence of k symbols in the letters 0, 1, . . . , b− 1 occurs in the base-b expansion of the given number with the expected frequency b−k. From an informal point of view, we can think of numbers normal in base 2 as those produced by flipping a fair coin, recording 1 for heads and 0 for tails. Normal numbers are those which are normal in every base. In this...
متن کاملTwo contradictory conjectures concerning Carmichael numbers
Erdős conjectured that there are x1−o(1) Carmichael numbers up to x, whereas Shanks was skeptical as to whether one might even find an x up to which there are more than √ x Carmichael numbers. Alford, Granville and Pomerance showed that there are more than x2/7 Carmichael numbers up to x, and gave arguments which even convinced Shanks (in person-to-person discussions) that Erdős must be correct...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Rendiconti Del Circolo Matematico Di Palermo
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1973-4409', '0009-725X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-021-00636-4