نتایج جستجو برای: our current judicial system suffers. our judges don

تعداد نتایج: 4121859  

Journal: :مطالعات حقوق خصوصی 0
مجید غمامی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران مجتبی اشراقی آرانی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

not well distinguishing between question fact and question of law, by lawyers, experts and judges produces unfavorable consequences on civil procedural system, from which substantially, our current judicial system suffers. our judges don't know well their duty to the wrong qualifications made in the pleas; solely being damages, the subject of plea, they rapidly assign the whole case to the...

پایان نامه :0 1391

employees always concern about losing their job , or in other word , losing their income resources. for this purpose, every government requires strong system for covering these concerns. the unemployment insurance (ui) program’s can be used for achieving this goal. in this thesis, we price ui based on the insurance history of employee and the duration of being unemployed. we use the weibull dis...

پایان نامه :دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی - دانشکده حقوق 1392

abstract the problems caused by the traditional system of criminal justice (which are based on remuneration and rehabilitation) such as, lack of attention to victim’s rights and position and society, underlie the emergence of restorative justice which had the victim-centered perspective, with respect to the role of the offender and participation of civil society. meanwhile, criminal mediation ...

2006
Gregory A. Huber Sanford C. Gordon

The sentencing decisions of trial judges are constrained by statutory limits imposed by legislatures. At the same time, judges in many states face periodic review, often by the electorate. We develop a model in which the effects of these features of a judge’s political landscape on judicial behavior interact. The model yields several intriguing results: First, if legislators care about the prop...

ژورنال: پزشکی قانونی 2020

The establishment of political relations between Belarus and Iran is more than 20 years ago. Although Belarus is an Eastern European country, many parts of its forensic system (the State Committee for Judicial Investigations of Belarus) are not unlike the current process of the Forensic Medicine Organization in Iran. Therefore, in this article, in order to acquaint our forensic physicions with ...

Journal: :مطالعات حقوق خصوصی 0
سیدمحمد حسینی دانشکده الهیات، دانشگاه تهران احمد رضوانی مفرد دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا

the safavid dynasty was the first iranian centralized administration, which chose shia’a branch of islam as the official religion and the judicial system for iran. in safavi period the state officially established two separate and distinct court system. first the state courts (the urf courts) under the supervision of the secular minister of justice (divan-begi) and the secondly the islamic cour...

Journal: :Information and Organization 2002
Lucas D. Introna

This paper is concerned with the possibility that the ethical claim of the other, that sense of being bound to the other, may becoming more and more difficult to experience as information technology increasingly mediates our social being. The paper will support the supposition of Don Caputo that obligation does not emanate from codes, imperatives or moral arguments. Rather it will argue that ob...

2016
Richard Primus

In Is Originalism Our Law?, William Baude has made a good kind of argument in favor of originalism. Rather than contending that originalism is the only coherent theory for interpreting a constitution, he makes the more modest claim that it happens to be the way that American judges interpret our Constitution.1 If he is right—if originalism is our law—then judges deciding constitutional cases ou...

Journal: :Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011
Shai Danziger Jonathan Levav Liora Avnaim-Pesso

Are judicial rulings based solely on laws and facts? Legal formalism holds that judges apply legal reasons to the facts of a case in a rational, mechanical, and deliberative manner. In contrast, legal realists argue that the rational application of legal reasons does not sufficiently explain the decisions of judges and that psychological, political, and social factors influence judicial rulings...

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید