نتایج جستجو برای: Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 Shareholder value

تعداد نتایج: 1001362  

Journal: :international journal of finance and managerial accounting 0
pankaj k. jain the university of memphis george johnson professor of finance and chair of finance department fogelman college of business and economics 300 fogelman college admin. building memphis, tn 38152-3120 zabihollah rezaee the university of memphis thompson-hill chair of excellence & professor of accountancy fogelman college of business and economics 300 fogelman college admin. building memphis, tn 38152-3120

purpose: this paper addresses whether and how the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002(sox) affects shareholder wealth (firm value) by focusing on the trade-off between improved corporate governance leading to a lower cost of capital and increased managerial compliance costs of regulations. design/methodology: we use an analytical model of solving the management utility maximization function and the chan...

2014

(a) This part implements procedures under section 806 of the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (‘‘Sarbanes-Oxley’’ or ‘‘Act’’), enacted into law July 30, 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley provides for employee protection from discrimination by companies and representatives of companies because the employee has engaged in protected activity ...

Journal: :Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 2011

Journal: :Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 2010

Journal: :Journal of Accounting and Economics 2007

Purpose: This paper addresses whether and how the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(SOX) affects shareholder wealth (firm value) by focusing on the trade-off between improved corporate governance leading to a lower cost of capital and increased managerial compliance costs of regulations. Design/Methodology: We use an analytical model of solving the management utility maximization function and the cha...

Journal: :Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 2011

2009
Brian T. O’Connell Marc W. Patry

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the conviction of Arthur Andersen, LLP for its involvement in the Enron scandal. The Court held that that the jury instructions did not accurately convey the meaning of the witness tampering statute that Andersen was charged with. Since the original trial, relevant sections of the Criminal Code were updated with the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002). Alt...

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید