Background One of the causative factors of root defects is the increased friction produced by rotary instrumentation. A high canal curvature may increase stress, making the tooth more susceptible to dentinal cracks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dentinal micro-crack formation with the ProTaper NEXT and ProTaper Universal systems using LED transillumination, and to analyze the micro-...

The cyclic resistance of ProTaper Universal (size 25/08) and ProTaper Next (size 25/06) instruments was compared in artificial canals with different curvatures in this study. A total of 30 ProTaper Universal and 30 ProTaper Next instruments were divided into 6 groups (n = 10) and were operated into artificial canals with 3 different angles of curvature (45°, 60°, 90°). The canal length was kept...

The purpose of the present study was to study the occurrence of radicular dentinal defects after using EDTA gel during preparation of the root canal with ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland), HyFlex (ColteneWhaledent, Allstetten, Switzerland), and ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer) rotary instruments. Forty-eight single rooted premolars were selected. Twelve teeth were instrumen...

INTRODUCTION The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of cracks in root dentin after root canal preparation with ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), HyFlex (Coltene-Whaledent, Allstetten, Switzerland), and ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer) rotary instruments. METHODS One-hundred mandibular premolars were selected. Twenty-five teeth were left...

Recently, the Protaper Next system (Dentsply/Maillefer) was launched into the dental market. In part one of this series, published in December’s issue of Endodontic Practice, the authors outlined the clinical guidelines for the use of the Protaper Next instruments. There are five instruments in the system but most canals can be prepared by using only the first two instruments. The first instrum...

Introduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shaping and centering ability of ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and WaveOne Classic systems (Dentsply Maillefer) in simulated root canals. Methods. Forty J-shaped canals in resin blocks were assigned to two groups (n = 20 for each group). Photographic method was used to record pre- and postinst...

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro amount of apically extruded debris with new endodontic rotary nickel-titanium instruments. METHODS Sixty mandibular premolars were instrumented up to size 25 using ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), ProTaper Next (Dentsply Maillefer), Twisted File Adaptive (SybronEndo, Orange, CA), and HyFlex (Co...

Aim:To compare the incidence of dentinal defects after preparation with reciprocating (Reciproc and WaveOne) and fullsequence rotary ProTaper Universal and Protaper Next instruments. Materials and methods:One hundred human mandibular premolars were randomly assigned to 5 groups (n = 20 teeth per group). The root canals were instrumented by using the reciprocating single-file systems Reciproc an...

AIM To assess and compare the amount of extruded debris after canal preparation using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next files. METHODOLOGY Forty extracted mandibular premolars with single canals and of similar lengths were instrumented using the ProTaper Universal F3 or the ProTaper Next X3. The extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The tube...