While it is widely believed that preemptibility is a necessary requirement for developing real-time software, there are additional costs involved with preemptive scheduling, as compared to non-preemptive scheduling. Furthermore, in the context of fixed-priority scheduling, feasibility of a task set with nonpreemptive scheduling does not imply feasibility with preemptive scheduling (and vice-ver...

Limited preemptive scheduling has been shown to dominate both non-preemptive and fully preemptive scheduling under fixed priority systems, as far as schedulability is concerned. This paper suggests the use of DVS and DMP techniques under limited preemptive scheduling to further reduce energy consumption with respect to a fully preemptive or non-preemptive approach.

Task scheduling in a preemptive runtime environment has potential advantages over the non-preemptive case such as better processor utilization and more flexibility when scheduling tasks. Furthermore, preemptive approaches may need less runtime support (e.g. no task ordering required). In contrast to the non-preemptive case, preemptive task scheduling in a distributed system has not received muc...

Contrary to traditional belief, we show in this paper, that for distributed systems non-preemptive scheduling can perform better than preemptive scheduling in the worst case in terms of task schedulability, under certain circumstances. We derive a worst-case delay bound for tasks scheduled using non-preemptive scheduling in a distributed system, where the task flow paths form a directed acyclic...

Partial answers have been provided in the real-time literature to the question whether preemptive systems are better than non-preemptive systems. This question has been investigated by many authors according to several points of view and it still remains open. Compared to preemptive real-time scheduling, non-preemptive real-time scheduling and the corresponding schedulability analyses have rece...

Preemptive scheduling is widespread in operating systems and in parallel processing on symmetric multiprocessors. However, in distributed systems it is practically unheard of. Scheduling in distributed systems is an important issue, and has performance impact on parallel processing, load balancing and metacomputing. Non-preemptive scheduling can perform well if the task lengths and processor sp...

While it is widely believed that preemptability is a necessary requirement for developing real-time software, there are additional costs involved with preemptive scheduling, as compared to non-preemptive scheduling. Furthermore, in the context of fixed-priority scheduling, feasibility of a task set with nonpreemptive scheduling does not imply feasibility with preemptive scheduling (and vice-ver...

In this paper, we investigate the non-preemptive scheduling problem as it arises in single processor systems. We focus on non-idling scheduling, the idling scheduling is briefly introduced in the lasts section. We extend some previously published results concerning preemptive and non-preemptive scheduling over a single processor. The main issue that we study in this article is the applicability...