To improve weak classifiers bagging and boosting could be used. These techniques are based on combining classifiers. Usually, a simple majority vote or a weighted majority vote are used as combining rules in bagging and boosting. However, other combining rules such as mean, product and average are possible. In this paper, we study bagging and boosting in Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and t...

Bagging and boosting are among the most popular resampling ensemble methods that generate and combine a diversity of regression models using the same learning algorithm as base-learner. Boosting algorithms are considered stronger than bagging on noisefree data. However, there are strong empirical indications that bagging is much more robust than boosting in noisy settings. For this reason, in t...

Bagging and boosting are two general techniques for building predictors based on small samples from a dataset. We show that boosting can be parallelized, and then present performance results for parallelized bagging and boosting using OC1 decision trees and two standard datasets. The main results are that sample sizes limit achievable accuracy, regardless of computational time spent; that paral...

Classiier committee learning approaches have demonstrated great success in increasing the prediction accuracy of classiier learning , which is a key technique for datamining. It has been shown that Boosting and Bagging, as two representative methods of this type, can signiicantly decrease the error rate of decision tree learning. Boosting is generally more accurate than Bagging, but the former ...

Gradient Boosting and bagging applied to regressors can reduce the error due to bias and variance respectively. Alternatively, Stochastic Gradient Boosting (SGB) and Iterated Bagging (IB) attempt to simultaneously reduce the contribution of both bias and variance to error. We provide an extensive empirical analysis of these methods, along with two alternate bias-variance reduction approaches — ...

In this paper we present an improvement of the precision of classification algorithm results. Two various approaches are known: bagging and boosting. This paper describes a set of experiments with bagging and boosting methods. Our use of these methods aims at classification algorithms generating decision trees. Results of performance tests focused on the use of the bagging and boosting methods ...

Bagging and boosting are among the most popular resampling ensemble methods that generate and combine a diversity of classifiers using the same learning algorithm for the base-classifiers. Boosting algorithms are considered stronger than bagging on noisefree data. However, there are strong empirical indications that bagging is much more robust than boosting in noisy settings. For this reason, i...

One approach in classification tasks is to use machine learning techniques to derive classifiers using learning instances. The cooperation of several base classifiers as a decision committee has succeeded to reduce classification error. The main current decision committee learning approaches boosting and bagging use resampling with the training set and they can be used with different machine le...

In previous researches it can been seen that Bagging, Boosting and Cross-Validation Committee can provide good performance separately. In this paper, Boosting methods are mixed with Bagging and Cross-Validation Committee in order to generate accurate ensembles and take benefit from all these alternatives. In this way, the networks are trained according to the boosting methods but the specific t...

One of the potential advantages of multiple classifier systems is an increased robustness to noise and other imperfections in data. Previous experiments on classification noise have shown that bagging is fairly robust but that boosting is quite sensitive. Decorate is a recently introduced ensemble method that constructs diverse committees using artificial data. It has been shown to generally ou...