نتایج جستجو برای: judicial security

تعداد نتایج: 190071  

Journal: : 2022

Beş büyük gücün veto yetkileriyle ağırlıklı olarak kontrol ettikleri Birleşmiş Milletler (BM) Güvenlik Konseyi oldukça geniş bir alanda kararlar almakta ve bu kararları hayata geçirmeleri için devletleri zorlamaktadır. karar alırken, BM Şartı’ndan kaynaklanan yetkilerini cömert yorumlamış şekilde “küresel yasa koyucu” rolüne bürünmüştür. Konseyi, özellikle 11 Eylül saldırılarından sonra ile tüm...

This article responds to the these two major questions, 1. Are there any certain principles and norms in judicial presumptions? 2. In judicial doctrine and proceedings, how are the evidences of judicial presumption introduced and then how are these evidences categorized and stipulated? In respond to the first question, four (public) principles are identified for judicial presumptions, which inc...

2007
Russell S. Sobel Joshua C. Hall

The quality of a state’s judicial system is an important determinant of economic growth and vitality. The decisions made within state judicial systems affect the degree to which private property rights are well-defined and enforced, which is an essential building block for entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. The key link between free-market institutions, such as secure property rights...

2008
Jay P. Kesan Gwendolyn G. Ball

The creation of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is widely regarded as an improvement in the system of patent litigation in the United States. However, there is still support for the creation of a specialized patent court at the trial level. Much of the support for the creation of such a court derives from the argument that most judges have too little experience to be familiar with ...

2017
Paul Daly PAUL DALY

The standard of review analysis for judicial review of administrative action developed by the Supreme Court of Canada before Dunsmuir v New Brunswick had two important features. First, it provided a bulwark against interventionist judges, thereby protecting the autonomy of administrative decision makers and promoting deference. Second, it was substantive, rather than formal, and moved the focus...

2007
THOMAS M. KECK

This paper explores three competing accounts of judicial review by comparing the enacting and invalidating coalitions for each of the fifty-three federal statutes struck down by the Supreme Court during its 1981 through 2005 terms. When a Republican judicial coalition invalidates a Democratic statute, the Court’s decision is consistent with a partisan account, and when a conservative judicial c...

2001
SUPREME COURTS Lewis A. Kornhauser

This chapter surveys the economic literature on judicial appeals and collegiality of courts. More general issues concerning judicial administration and court organization are surveyed in a companion chapter. JEL classification: K4

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید