may exercise its right to appear in court through its own solicitor and need not be represented by an United States Attorney.'6" Pursuant to section 25, it is provided that orders issued by the Commission may be reviewed by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals. In the absence of a specific request, hearings on the question of retaining certain reports as confidential are not provided for....

Lower courts supposedly follow Supreme Court precedent—but they often don’t. Instead of adhering to the most persuasive interpretations of the Court’s opinions, lower courts often adopt narrower readings. For example, recent courts of appeals’ decisions have narrowly interpreted the Court’s rulings on police searches, gun control, and campaign finance. This practice—which I call “narrowing from...

Evolutionary game theory is often used to analyze the evolution of moral preferences. A few studies also examine the coevolution of preferences and an institutional aspect of the decision environment. Allowing the adaptation of just one institutional aspect such as litigation or legal insurance to coevolve with morality, however, may be inadequate. If court rulings coevolve with morality the ne...

sīra is of a sublime status in shī‘a jurisprudence and has been used as the most important reason in endorsed rulings of islam. the shī‘a jurists have used it as one of their evidences for inference of rulings to the extent that they have regarded it as superior to consensus (ijmā‘) and viewed the authority of sīra as a cause for endorsement or non-hindrance by the infallibles (a.s.). in the co...

Using the analytical method, purpose of this paper is to emphasize some constitutional and legal principles, whose application implementation will lead UAE judiciary governance. Six major principles can be summarized as a result these (Khalil, 2022). A few serve foundation for judicial governance; others guarantee Further, openness judiciary, confrontation between litigants, appeals against cou...

This article studies the hidden blemishes of two benchmark rulings European Court Justice (ECJ). In 2015 and 2018, ECJ approved unconventional monetary instruments, among others ‘Outright Monetary Transactions’ ‘Public Sector Purchase Program’. Yet, there is a vigorous debate about both operations in law economics. this interdisciplinary article, we address economic arguments order to elucidate...

Abstract The status of trade union rights in the EU has been contentious since CJEU sent shockwaves through unions Europe December 2007 with its rulings cases Viking and Laval . In recent Holship ruling, ECtHR challenged these rulings. Contrary to assertion that it is inherent very exercise right take collective action they will be prejudiced a certain degree, stated “the degree which risks hav...

Background: Judgment of a criminal policy Resolving criminal cases in various ways and manifestations, outside the scope of official repressive measures, is a strategy of contracting criminal law derived from civil law, and its main root is in ethics and morality. In society, and given that the prosecution of a criminal case is not the main purpose of criminal law; Rather, prosecution is seen a...