Both Heidegger and Wittgenstein consider the possibility of a philosophical inquiry an absolutely universal scope—an into being all beings, in Heidegger’s case, logical form everything that can be meaningfully said, Wittgenstein’s. Moreover, they both raise worry theoretical language by means which we speak particular beings assert facts is not suitable for this task. And yet their own work see...

A Turkish translation of a version of this essay has been published as “Bir, bir şey değildir: post-metafizik düşüncede birlik ve çokluğun akıbeti,” trans. Mustafa Yalçınkaya, Sabah Ülkesi: Üç aylık kültür-sanat ve felsefe dergisi, no. 51, Nisan 2017, 16–19. Available online at http://www.sabahulkesi.com/sayi.php?no=51, retrieved 27 April 2017. The themes of this essay are discussed in more det...

As one of the most famous philosophers of the twentieth century, Heidegger has proposed significant ideas about ontology. The undercurrent of his philosophy is the question of being in the world or Dasein. He believes that human is the only creature for whom being in the world is a question and only human is capable of asking about Dasein. Heidegger thinks that authentic poets with their partic...

The book is a critical discussion of the conception of language as worlddisclosure that Heidegger develops explicitly in his writings after the Kehre, but that has its roots in Being and Time. According to this view, our access to the world, and to anything that might show up within the world, is structured by language. This view of language allows Heidegger to criticize the mentalism character...

Dewey openly admitted that he had not achieved systematic unity in his philosophy, even though it had been a goal of his to develop a coherent philosophy of experience. This lack of systematic unity is encountered in the equivocal nature of much of the interrelation amongst his many arguments and terms resulting in frustration for many, a frustration that may have hindered a deeper understandin...