Fernandez Comment [1] on our pseudo-perturbative shifted-l expansion technique [2,3] is either unfounded or ambiguous. In his comment [1] on our pseudo-perturbation shifted l expansion technique (PSLET) [2,3], Fernandez strived to prove that (I) PSLET is just a version of SLNT, (II) it is not true that PSLET enables one to obtain more perturbation corrections than SLNT, and (III) it seems that ...