The Wrong Question? is the response by an anthropologist to a question posed philosopher concerning intelligibility of alien forms thought. I argue that it wrong describe problem as one logic or rationality. Indeed, foreign practices (no less than our own) may become intelligible only once they are not evaluated according abstract criteria To ask given practice form life whether rational error ...

This poem is an interpretive poetic transcription describing the experience of a young immigrant child. Being on “wrong side” becomes symbolic representation internal and external conflict between different ways to know. Schools are not always safe place for children whose lives have been uprooted unless teachers become advocates allies.

Consequentialists say we may always promote the good. Deontologists object: not if that means killing one to save five. “Consequentializers” reply: this act is wrong, but it for best, since worse than letting die. I argue reply undercuts “compellingness” of consequentialism, which comes from an outcome-based view action collapses distinction between and