Polarizing discussions on political and social issues are common in mass and user-generated media. However, computer-based understanding of ideological discourse has been considered too difficult to undertake. In this paper we propose a statistical model for ideology discourse. By ideology we mean “a set of general beliefs socially shared by a group of people.” For example, Democratic and Repub...

in this article naser al-din shah’s accounts of travels to europe (safar-nameh) have bee examined and criticised in a discourse analysis approach. by using this approach, attention has been paid to linguistic factors, co-text and context of the situation (social, cultural, political and historical), and institutional position, as well as the writer's attitude which has been effective in informi...

Deixis is manifested especially as the pronouns I, you and he. It possible to appoint person producing discourse participant in it. may be received, accompanied by gestures, express a specific purpose help addressee communicate meaning of what referred to. When using pronoun, refer one parties determine their place it, if speaker has political authority. The mechanism used deixis direct success...

The review covers the collective monograph “Communicative Aggressions of 21st Century” dedicated to study destructive manifestations communicative aggression in media sphere connected with functional specifics contemporary information technologies and, particular, Internet. deals contents book and its structure, evaluates understanding by authors aggression, features consequences. Special empha...

analysis and the continued success of the moderate islamic discourse on other discourses in turkey in a social environment that nearlya century in the western orientation and secular changes in the basis of social, political and cultural, is the central issue to the most article. this article goes beyond the ideological debates, in the analysis of this fundamental change in this country as a lo...

How do Americans acquire the impression that their political foes have some understandable basis for their views, and thus represent a legitimate opposition? How do they come to believe that reasonable people may disagree on any given political controversy? Given that few people talk regularly to those of opposing perspectives, some theorize that mass media, and television in particular, serve ...