Abstract In this article, we revisit the analysis of Laband and Tollison (Appl Econ 38(14):1649–1653, 2006) who documented that articles with two authors in alphabetical order are cited much more often than non-alphabetized papers American Economic Review Journal Agricultural Economics . Using 120,000 multi-authored from Web Science economics subject category, demonstrate first alphabetization ...

objective: this paper tries to analyse and visualize the co-authorship network of institutions in 1351 papers published in 7 knowledge and information science journals in iran from 1387 through 1391.methodology: in this paper, we use scientometric and social network analysis to study the collaboration network of institutions. overall structure of the network was investigated using a few macro-l...

Authorship is a central element of scientific research carrying a variety of rewards and responsibilities, and while various guidelines exist, actual author contributions are often ambiguous. Inconsistent or limited contributions threaten to devalue authorship as intellectual currency and diminish authors' responsibility for published content. Researchers have assessed author contributions in t...

The editorial board of the Korean Journal of Family Medicine has received several queries, especially regarding publication ethics. Among the many areas of research publication ethics, the authorship dispute has been one of the most popular issues. Some authors may request the addition of an extra author or removal of others. Sometimes, they want co-authorship (co-first authorship or co-corresp...

II CO-AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT III

this paper aims to study the performance of the international journal of information science and management (ijism) over a decade using scientometric approach. it also tries to study the                     co-authorship network of authors and institutions using different macro- and micro-level social network analysis metrics. a total of 173 articles published in 23 issues of the ijism covering...

A time-dependent centrality metric for disciplinary co-authorship graphs, the “Nobel number” for a discipline, is introduced. A researcher's Nobel number for a given discipline in a given year is defined as the researcher's average co-authorship distance to that discipline's Nobel laureates in that year. Plotting Nobel numbers over several decades provides a quantitative as well as visual indic...

........................................................................................................................................... ii Co-Authorship ................................................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................