In this paper we study the relation between module amenability of $theta$-Lau product $A×_theta B$ and that of Banach algebras $A, B$. We also discuss module biprojectivity of $A×theta B$. As a consequent we will see that for an inverse semigroup $S$, $l^1(S)×_theta l^1(S)$ is module amenable if and only if $S$ is amenable.

in this paper we study the relation between module amenability of θ - lau product a×θb and that of banach algebras a, b. we also discuss module biprojectivity of a×θb. as a consequent we will see that for an inverse semigroup s, l 1 (s) ×θ l 1 (s) is module amenable if and only if s is amenable.

There are two notions of amenability for discrete equivalence relations. The \global" amenability (which is usually referred to just as \amenability") is the property of existence of leafwise invariant means, which, by a theorem of Connes{Feldman{Weiss, is equivalent to hyperrniteness, or, to being the orbit equivalence relation of a Z-action. The notion of \local" amenability applies to equiva...

We prove that the following are equivalent for a locally compact group G: (i) G is amenable; (ii) M(G) is Connes-amenable; (iii) M(G) has a normal, virtual diagonal.

We extend the concept of amenability of a Banach algebra A to the case that there is an extra A -module structure on A, and show that when S is an inverse semigroup with subsemigroup E of idempotents, then A = l(S) as a Banach module over A= l(E) is module amenable iff S is amenable. When S is a discrete group, l(E) = C and this is just the celebrated Johnson’s theorem.