We p.S#&$ IQst year two mticles dealing with the a i m and relevante of the so-called 'nem first was by Professor Richrd Watson (1972, 210-15) and the second by ,301-4). We also pubhhed a r h by David C h k e of 'Explanation tson, S. A . LeBlanc and C. L. Redman (1972, 237-9). Here, nd Tutor of Peterhouse, Cambridge, sets out his com'dered views archaeology, some of which he has already dkeusse...