The recent High Court ruling upholding a prior decision to allow a mother to sue for the cost of rearing a child after having had a failed sterilisation has understandably attracted great controversy (Cattanach v Melchior [2003]). The implications of this decision on what can now be claimed for through medical litigation are significant, and lawyers and doctors will extract from it lessons for ...

Super-peer topologies have been found efficient and effective in heterogeneous peer-to-peer networks. Due to dominant position of super-peers, super-peer selection requires a protocol that is aware of peer capacities. Lack of global information about other peers capacity and dynamic nature of peer-to-peer networks are two major challenges that impose uncertainty in decisionmaking. SG-1, is a we...

The use of a simple 50%-50% box score of decisions for parents and districts, respectively, is a false measure of the impartiality of hearing officers under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This analysis canvasses relevant structural factors that the stakeholders, the mass media, and the professional literature have failed to recognize both generally and systematically. T...

The Supreme Court decision on school desegregation 25 years ago-Brown v. Board o f ~ducatio-ushered in an era in which the law courts have carried an ever-growing share of the burden of social reform and policy change in this country. Even though several current members of the Supreme Court were appointed as "strict constructionists," and think of themselves as not in the business of setting so...

Air freight network is one of the important means to improve the competitiveness of express enterprises. This paper establishes the model from two aspects, hub location decisions and hub number decisions, with the goal to achieve the lowest air freight network cost, based on the “hub-spoke” theory. Then, computes the cost of different number of hubs, and uses super-efficiency DEA model to decid...

The landmark case of Jackson v. Indiana is well known to forensic psychiatrists, but little is known of the personal and legal background of this case. Mr. Jackson's state hospital records were reviewed, as were available transcripts and decisions of the Indiana court proceedings, before and after the U.S. Supreme Court decision, and local newspaper coverage, to understand how this case developed.