In Brief I n August 2001 France and Germany proposed that the United Nations develop an " international convention against the reproductive cloning of human beings. " The primary impetus behind the initiative was apparently a concern that those threatening to clone a human being would engage in venue shopping, looking for a nation that had not yet legally banned reproductive cloning. An interna...

The dominant reaction to recent advances in cloning technology has been a strong desire to prohibit all human reproductive cloning. A frequently mentioned concern of those who would ban all such cloning is the high rate of waste of oocytes, embryos, and fetuses.1 While this concern is valid, these remarks will focus on potential uses of human reproductive cloning after research with animals and...

The ability of scientists to apply cloning technology to humans has provoked public discussion and media coverage. The present paper reports on a series of studies examining public attitudes to human cloning in the UK, bringing together a range of quantitative and qualitative methods to address this question. These included a nationally representative survey, an experimental vignette study, foc...

BACKGROUND The regulation of human cloning continues to be a significant national and international policy issue. Despite years of intense academic and public debate, there is little clarity as to the philosophical foundations for many of the emerging policy choices. The notion of "human dignity" is commonly used to justify cloning laws. The basis for this justification is that reproductive hum...

How to cite this article: Van den Berg, M.E.S., 2012, ‘Human reproductive cloning and biotechnology: Rational, ethical and public concerns’, Koers – Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 77(2), Art. #412, 9 pages. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4102/koers.v77i2.412 Previous research indicates a lack of clear international guidelines on the permissibility of embryonic stem cell research and human reproducti...