This paper is a critical analysis of recent case decided by the Brazilian Constitutional Court, which can be considered as paradigmatic current approach law with reference to constitutional interpretation. The regards unconstitutionality statute provision allowed enforcement penalties pending second instance appeal and therefore before res judicata . aims at discussing concept provisions legal ...

Abstract This paper seeks to investigate the interaction between Law, society, and social change in context of a judicial case. For this purpose, case Colombian Constitutional Court decision C-075 2007, on recognition patrimonial rights same-sex couples, will be analyzed. The objective is determine how was identified, proven, used law premises Luhmann Teubner were employed develop analysis alon...

according to the articles 169 to 179 of the civil judgment enforcement law, the enforcement of the foreign judgment in the iranian law is based on the reciprocal act. but extension of international relations in the world today, above all in the commercial domain, requires that enforcement of foreign judgment be accepted after obtaining its correctness conditions based on res judicata. therefore...

This study examines the legal consequences of industrial relations court decisions that exceed time limit 50 working days from first trial. research is normative research, which conducting by examining various laws and regulations principles related to settlement disputes. The results indicate court's decision still legally valid even though has passed trial as regulated in Article 103 PPHI Law...

The article is focused on the current problem of distinguishing means ordinary and extraordinary review court decisions, in view universally recognized value finality a judgment unacceptability groundless interference with res judicata.
 Based examples some civil law countries substantiates most common grounds for intervention into final which are considered sufficient, as well introduces ...

Several cases causing invalidity of procedural acts, both acts the parties and judicial proceedings, refer to triple-identity rule required for claim as object litigation: either in order not repeat a second identical proceeding (confirmatory act, lis pendens res judicata, depending on whether first was initiated by consenting is process or has concluded with finaljudgment merits), alter that w...