a roman dominating function (rdf) on a graph g = (v,e) is defined to be a function satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f(u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f(v) = 2. a set s v is a restrained dominating set if every vertex not in s is adjacent to a vertex in s and to a vertex in . we define a restrained roman dominating function on a graph g = (v,e) to be ...

A dominating set S of a graph G is a locating-dominating-set, LD-set for short, if every vertex v not in S is uniquely determined by the set of neighbors of v belonging to S. Locating-dominating sets of minimum cardinality are called LDcodes and the cardinality of an LD-code is the location-domination number, λ(G). An LD-set S of a graph G is global if it is an LD-set for both G and its complem...

A dominating set S of a graph G is a locating-dominating-set, LD-set for short, if every vertex v not in S is uniquely determined by the set of neighbors of v belonging to S. Locating-dominating sets of minimum cardinality are called LDcodes and the cardinality of an LD-code is the location-domination number, λ(G). An LD-set S of a graph G is global if it is an LD-set for both G and its complem...

Let k ∈ Z +. A − distance Roman dominating function (kDRDF) on G = (V, E) is a f : V → {0, 1, 2} such that for every vertex v with f(v) 0, there u f(u) 2 d(u, v) ≤ k. The global (GkDRDF) if and only its complement G. weight of the value w(f) P x∈V f(x). minimum graph called domination number denoted as γ gR(G). gR(G) Note that, 1 usual γgR(G), is, γgR(G). authors initiated this study. In paper,...

How is it that global elite universities operating in a hyper-competitive world replete with aspirational challengers maintain positions of dominance within the field higher education decade after decade? Taking Bourdieusian approach, we argue highest-ranking strategically leverage pronounced philanthropic advantages to differentiate themselves from would-be challengers. Philanthropy critical d...

We consider two general frameworks for multiple domination, which are called 〈r, s〉-domination and parametric domination. They generalise and unify {k}-domination, k-domination, total k-domination and k-tuple domination. In this paper, known upper bounds for the classical domination are generalised for the 〈r, s〉-domination and parametric domination numbers. These generalisations are based on t...

This response refutes point (i) in the Ayres comment’s abstract. It argues that at its heart responsive regulation is about seeking strategies that will render regulation more relational when it counts. This is possible even in domains like tax compliance where 99 per cent of the routine regulatory action occurs without face-to-face encounter. A number of critiques in the special issue are embr...