In the Funding Statement, an organization providing funding to the last author (HDO) is incorrectly omitted. The Funding Statement should read: "This work was supported by a grant by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF; GerontoMitoSys 0315584A) and the LOEWE excellence initiative of the State of Hesse within the framework of the Cluster for Integrative Fungal Research (IPF) to...

There are errors in the Funding Statement. The correct funding is as follows: ‘‘Funding for this project was provided by Czech Science Foundation (Project No. 206/12/0750), Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (Project RVO 61388963) and Charles University in Prague (Project SVV 260084). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparati...

There was an error in the Funding statement. The Funding statement should read: ‘‘Funding for AFEC-X 2012 was provided by Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (XTBG), World Agroforestry Institute (ICRAF, East Asia node) Kunming Office, and the Key Laboratory for Tropical Forest Ecology (XTBG). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or prep...

The Funding statement in the PDF version of this article is incorrect. The publisher apologizes for the error. The correct Funding statement is: This work was supported by funding from the Cancéropôle Lyon Auvergne Rhône Alpes and the French NCI (under PHRC grant 12007 and Lyric grant INCa-DGOS-4664). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or...

In the selection process, determining a university funding research proposal at Tunas Pembangunan University (UTP) still has not fully used information technology to support related institutions, namely UTP Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM). So that it obstacles requires long time. we need system is able help these institutions make easier determine recipients of proposals are...

As more new and improved vaccines become available, decisions on which to adopt into routine programmes become more frequent and complex. This qualitative study aimed to explore processes of national decision-making around new vaccine adoption and to understand the factors affecting these decisions. Ninety-five key informant interviews were conducted in seven low- and middle-income countries: B...

The grant number for the National Natural Science Foundation of China is incorrect. Please refer to the complete funding statement here: This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11274046) & Peking Union Medical College Innovation Funding (No. 3332013021). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or ...