The goal of this paper is to provide an integrative framework linking merger and acquisition activities with executive compensation. Making an extensive review of existing studies we aim at shedding more light on current and emerging knowledge in this field of investigation and suggesting directions for future research. A framework is presented which organizes the literature along two dimension...

This paper attempts to detect the determinants of board and CEO compensation as well as the different components of the board compensation in the context of an emerging economy, India, where managerial market is yet to be developed. I use panel data of the Indian manufacturing sector to explore two broad issues on determination of board and CEO compensation. First what is the effect of corporat...

The governance life-cycle, is here defined as changes in ownership structure, and including both the identity of the major owner and ownership concentration. The cycle is marked by key events and phases including start-up, initial growth, mature growth, and possibly a crisis and restructuring stage or exit stage. The governance cycle for transitional countries reflects some specific characteris...

This study combines elements of the upper echelons and agency perspectives to resolve some of the ambiguity surrounding how corporate elites affect corporate strategy. We propose and test the notion that while differences in individual characteristics of corporate elites may imply different preferences for particular corporate strategies such as diversification and acquisitions, these basic pre...

We study the dynamic bidirectional relationship between firm R&D intensity and corporate diversification, using longitudinal data of Spanish manufacturing companies. Our empirical approach takes into account the censored nature of the dependent variables and the existence of firm-specific unobserved heterogeneity. Whereas we find a positive linear effect of R&D intensity on related diversificat...

This paper studies the announcement returns to diversifying mergers from 1950 to 2002. It is widely believed that corporate diversification destroys value, but we find that combined (bidder + target) announcement returns were significantly positive for diversifying mergers throughout the period. The return from diversifying mergers fell after the 1970s, consistent with the view that investors s...

Does corporate diversification reduce shareholder value? Since firms endogenously choose to diversify, exogenous variation in diversification is necessary to draw inferences about the causal effect. We examine changes in the within-firm dispersion of industry investment, or ‘‘diversity’’. We find that exogenous changes in diversity, due to changes in industry investment, are negatively related ...

Does corporate diversification reduce shareholder value? Since firms endogenously choose to diversify, exogenous variation in diversification is necessary in order to draw inferences about the causal effect. We examine changes in the within-firm dispersion of industry investment, or “diversity.” We find that exogenous changes in diversity, due to changes in industry investment, are negatively r...