نتایج جستجو برای: tree adjoining grammars

تعداد نتایج: 180845  

2014
Makoto Kanazawa

I define a generalization of linear indexed grammars that is equivalent to simple context-free tree grammars in the same way that linear indexed grammars are equivalent to tree-adjoining grammars.

2012
Johannes Osterholzer Torsten Stüber

In this work, we present a generalization of the state-split method to probabilistic hypergraphs. We show how to represent the derivational stucture of probabilistic tree-adjoining grammars by hypergraphs and detail how the generalized state-split procedure can be applied to such representations, yielding a state-split procedure for tree-adjoining grammars.

2004
Miguel A. Alonso Éric de la Clergerie Manuel Vilares

Tree Adjoining Grammars (TAG) and Linear Indexed Grammars (LIG) are extensions of Context Free Grammars that generate the class of Tree Adjoining Languages. Taking advantage of this property, and providing a method for translating a TAG into a LIG, we define several parsing algorithms for TAG on the basis of their equivalent LIG parsers. We also explore why some practical optimizations for TAG ...

2011
Sylvain Schmitz

1 Mildly Context-Sensitive Syntax 5 1.1 Tree Adjoining Grammars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.1.1 Linguistic Analyses Using TAGs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Lexicalized Grammar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Long-Distance Dependencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.1.2 Background: Context-Free Tree Grammars . . . . . . . . . . 10 IO and OI Derivat...

2009
Steve DeNeefe Kevin Knight

Tree Adjoining Grammars have well-known advantages, but are typically considered too difficult for practical systems. We demonstrate that, when done right, adjoining improves translation quality without becoming computationally intractable. Using adjoining to model optionality allows general translation patterns to be learned without the clutter of endless variations of optional material. The a...

2002
Philippe de Groote

categorial grammars are not intended as yet another grammatical formalism that would compete with other established formalisms. It should rather be seen as the kernel of a grammatical framework — in the spirit of (Ranta, 2002) — in which other existing grammatical models may be encoded. This paper illustrates this fact by showing how tree-adjoining grammars (Joshi and Schabes, 1997) may be embe...

1992
Aravind K. Joshi Yves Schabes

In this paper, we will describe a tree generating system called tree-adjoining grammar(TAG)and state some of the recent results about TAGs. The work on TAGS is motivated by linguistic considerations. However, a number of formal results have been established for TAGs, which we believe, would be of interest to researchers in tree grammars and tree automata. After giving a short introduction to TA...

1990
Yves Schabes K. Vijay-Shanker

We define a set of deterministic bottom-up left to right parsers which analyze a subset of Tree Adjoining Languages. The LR parsing strategy for Context Free Grammars is extended to Tree Adjoining Grammars (TAGs). We use a machine, called Bottom-up Embedtied Push Down Automaton (BEPDA), that recognizes in a bottom-up fashion the set of Tree Adjoining Languages (and exactly this se0. Each parser...

2014
K. Vijay Shanker Aravind K. Joshi

Many current grammar formalisms used in computational linguistics take a unification-based approach that use structures (called feature structures) containing sets of feature-value pairs. In this paper, we describe a unification-based approach to Tree Adjoining Grammars (TAG). The resulting formalism (UTAG) retains the principle of factoring dependencies and recursion that is fundamental to TAG...

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید