Scholars praise the whistleblower protections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as one of the most protective anti-retaliation provisions i n the world. Yet, during its first three years, only 3.6% of Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowers won relief through the initial administrative process that adjudicates such claims, and only 6.5% of whistleblowers won appeals through the process. This Article repo...

In the wake of the Enron and WorldCom accounting scandals, nonaudit services provided by auditors have come under the scrutiny of Congress as reflected in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In an attempt to better understand the impact of the Act, this study sets forth two specific objectives. The first objective is to examine the value relevance of auditor’s fees. The other objective is to invest...

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was established to strengthen internal controls over financial reporting by U.S. public firms and, as a consequence, to increase investor and stakeholder confidence in published financial reports. Among the many SOX provisions, SOX 404 requires an annual assessment by the firm’s executive management and external auditor of the firm’s internal controls over f...

This paper examines cross-listing behavior onto U.S. and U.K. stock exchanges following the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and tests two propositions. First, has the rate of foreign cross-listings onto U.S. exchanges decreased in the period following the enactment of the Act? Second, are foreign exchanges in particular, the London Stock Exchange attracting foreign firms in the post-Act pe...

This Article considers how some recent developments affect our understanding of the relative superiority of our mixed federal system of corporate lawmaking as compared with either a purely state system or a purely national one. The mixed federal system can potentially capture the gains of efficiency, flexibility, and responsiveness from state competition, while using the threat and occasional r...

Compliance with the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) has been hampered by the lack of implementation details. This article argues that IT departments that have implemented ten categories of IT controls provided by the International Standards Organization (ISO 17799) will be well on their way toward SOX compliance. A side-by-side comparison of the 124 control components of the ISO Standard and t...

There has been a long-standing debate as to the relative merits of mandatory auditor rotation. In the United States (US), Section 203 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) (SOX) requires rotation of the lead engagement partner and the concurring review partner at least once every five years. Section 207 also requires a study on the potential effects of mandatory audit firm rotation. After conducting...