We, the undersigned, oppose any response to the judgment that would result in a movement away from the use of logical methods for evidence evaluation. A paper in this issue of the Journal [2] re-iterates logical principles of evidence interpretation that are accepted by a broad range of those who have an interest in forensic reasoning. The divergence between those principles of interpretation a...

On 14 December 2001, the High Court of South Africa delivered its judgment in Treatment Action Campaign et al v Minister of Health et al, ruling that the government was in breach of its constitutional obligations and must promptly develop and implement a comprehensive national program to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV, including making antiretroviral drugs available for this purpos...

SUMMARY In 2013 Zimbabwe enacted a new Constitution, introducing raft of changes, among them, the introduction constitutional socio-economic rights. Not soon thereafter rights were tested in case Mushoriwa v City Harare 2014. The High Court made finding favour applicant, decision which enforced right to water section 77 Constitution. ruling offered view that bylaws used unconstitutional and con...

Abstract With the constant flow of data across jurisdictions, issues regarding conflicting laws and protection rights arise. This article considers EU–US transfer relationship in aftermath decision Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Maximillian Schrems where Court Justice European Union (CJEU) invalidated an agreement for second time just five years. judgment continues line cases e...

Objectives: The study aims to define the jurisprudence and legal purpose, clarifying term Corona vaccine, then highlighting medical evaluation of vaccines, mentioning Sharia ruling on vaccinations, with clarification compulsory vaccination, jurisprudential effects vaccine.
 Methods: research followed descriptive approach, by tracking statements scientists evidence describing them, deduce a...

murder is among the most abominable human acts and the most criminal behavior of mankind; in shī’a jurisprudence, punishment for deliberate murder is qiṣāṣ (retaliated punishment) in general. on the basis of this general principle, murder of child by father is regarded as an exception. on that account, the ruling concerning the mother in this respect is set forth and with respect to the solidit...

Background: Infertility, defined by the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after twelve months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse. infertility is an important health problem in the society .tubal pathology is one of the main causes of infertility.it is estimated to account for 12-33%.hysterosalpingography is a method used for screening purposes in the routine infertility eva...

In the commented judgment, Supreme Administrative Court (hereinafter: Court) made a significant confirmation of effectiveness sending applications by electronic means (ordinary e-mail) to entities obliged under provisions Act on Access Public Information, even when such an application (e-mail) does not go directly mailbox address or e-mail specific person indicated as competent accept them beha...

In Hollington v Hewthorn & Co Ltd 2 1943 All ER 35 it was held that a finding of criminal court did not have any probative value in subsequent civil action and inadmissible as evidence. Despite the case being one English origin, South African courts largely adopted this ruling grounded our common law. paper, judgment is critically analysed order to determine its continued applicability face...