Abstract Business ethicists disagree on whether John Rawls’s political philosophy can be applied to their questions and concerns. They concur, however, that, if warranted, such an application of his theory would highly instructive for the field. This article scrutinizes that assumption. The paper examines what extent a normative import into business ethics indeed render adequate results. Highli...

1. Rawls puts forward a proposal of political philosophy suitable for a pluralistic society where members try to establish and make persistent a stable social cooperation. The proposal is very sophisticated and takes into consideration numerous elements of a complex society. First of all, it is worth pointing out that the model of society proposed by Rawls is a liberal society, based on the ide...

In this paper, I contrast two approaches to political legitimacy, both influenced by Rawls. One is the classic liberal picture, according which a state legitimate if its “constitutional essentials” could be endorsed reasonable citizens. The alternative idea that what makes primarily success at organizing basic structure in way demonstrably favorable governed. Specifically, suggest insofar as it...

this paper, in its first part, analyzes the status and history of the principle of “maximization of the good” and the different meanings of “maximization” and “good.” after explaining and analyzing this principle and its different interpretations, in the first part, this paper, in its second part, categorizes rawls’s criticisms on it, step by step, by extracting and mentioning their premises. i...

This essay creates an unlikely conversation between two 20th century thinkers: John Rawls and Michael Oakeshott. I say “unlikely” because apart from a few scant remarks in the writing of each did not directly engage other. The begins by examining Oakeshott’s explication “The Rationalist” her tradition history political thought. Specifically, shows that rationalism politics involves belief reaso...