Before we state our main theorems, we begin with some notation: given a finite subset A of some commutative ring, we let A + A denote the set of sums a + b, where a, b ∈ A; and, we let A.A denote the set of products ab, a, b ∈ A. When three or more sums or products are used, we let kA denote the k-fold sumset A+A+ · · ·+A, and let A denote the k-fold product set A.A...A. Lastly, by d ∗ A we mea...

Before we state our main theorems, we begin with some notation: given a finite subset A of some commutative ring, we let A + A denote the set of sums a + b, where a, b ∈ A; and, we let A.A denote the set of products ab, a, b ∈ A. When three or more sums or products are used, we let kA denote the k-fold sumset A+A+ · · ·+A, and let A denote the k-fold product set A.A...A. Lastly, by d ∗ A we mea...

It is conjectured that a class of n-fold integral transformations {I(α)|α ∈ C} forms a mutually commutative family, namely, we have I(α)I(β) = I(β)I(α) for α, β ∈ C. The commutativity of I(α) for the two-fold integral case is proved by using several summation and transformation formulas for the basic hypergeometric series. An explicit formula for the complete system of the eigenfunctions for n ...

Before we state our main theorems, we begin with some notation: given a finite subset A of some commutative ring, we let A + A denote the set of sums a + b, where a, b ∈ A; and, we let A.A denote the set of products ab, a, b ∈ A. When three or more sums or products are used, we let kA denote the k-fold sumset A+A+ · · ·+A, and let A denote the k-fold product set A.A...A. Lastly, by d ∗ A we mea...

Before we state our main theorems, we begin with some notation: given a finite subset A of some commutative ring, we let A + A denote the set of sums a + b, where a, b ∈ A; and, we let A.A denote the set of products ab, a, b ∈ A. When three or more sums or products are used, we let kA denote the k-fold sumset A+A+ · · ·+A, and let A denote the k-fold product set A.A...A. Lastly, by d ∗ A we mea...

The Kodaira-Spencer map is a component of the connection ∇. In particular, this implies that if κs 6= 0 then the connection∇ is nontrivial with respect to the Hodge decomposition. Various Hodge-theory facts imply that the global monodromy must be nontrivial in this case. We can be a bit more precise: if u ∈ V p,q is a vector such that κs(v)(u) 6= 0 for some tangent vector v ∈ T (S)s, then u can...

in this paper, a commutative semigroup will be written as a disjoint :union: of its cancellative subsemigroups. based on this fact we will define the left regular representation of a commutative separative semigroup and show that this representation is faithful. finally concrete examples of commutative separative semigroups, their decompositions and their left regular representations are given.

in this paper, we define the notions of fuzzy congruence relations and fuzzy convex subalgebras on a commutative residuated lattice and we obtain some related results. in particular, we will show that there exists a one to one correspondence between the set of all fuzzy congruence relations and the set of all fuzzy convex subalgebras on a commutative residuated lattice. then we study fuzzy...

In this paper, we define the notions of fuzzy congruence relations and fuzzy convex subalgebras on a commutative residuated lattice and we obtain some related results. In particular, we will show that there exists a one to one correspondence between the set of all fuzzy congruence relations and the set of all fuzzy convex subalgebras on a commutative residuated lattice. Then we study fuzzy...