نتایج جستجو برای: روش x2

تعداد نتایج: 378310  

Journal: :Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 2020

2009
XIAO-MING ZHANG

This paper gives another new proof method of analytic inequality involving n variables. As its applications, we give proof of some known-well inequalities and prove five new analytic inequalities. 1. monotonicity on special variables Throughout the paper R denotes the set of real numbers and R+ denotes the set of strictly positive real numbers. Let n ≥ 2, n ∈ N. The arithmetic mean A(x) and the...

Journal: :Pattern Recognition Letters 1996

Journal: :Arkiv för Matematik 1962

2016

1. We just write out (i). Recall that X1 ∪ X2 = {x : x ∈ X1 or x ∈ X2}. Hence x ∈ X1 =⇒ x ∈ X1 ∪ X2, so that X1 ⊆ X1 ∪ X2. By symmetry, X1 ⊆ X1 ∪ X2. Finally, suppose that Y is a set such that X1 ⊆ Y and X2 ⊆ Y . Let x ∈ X1 ∪X2. Then x ∈ X1 or x ∈ X2. If x ∈ X1, then x ∈ Y since X1 ⊆ Y . Similarly, if x ∈ X2, then x ∈ Y . Thus in either case x ∈ Y , so that X1 ∪X2 ⊆ Y . 2. (i) Injective, not su...

2012
Guo Zhen LU Ya Yuan XIAO

The main purpose of this paper is to derive a new (p, q)-atomic decomposition on the multi-parameter Hardy space H(X1 ×X2) for 0 < p0 < p ≤ 1 for some p0 and all 1 < q < ∞, where X1 × X2 is the product of two spaces of homogeneous type in the sense of Coifman and Weiss. This decomposition converges in both L(X1 × X2) (for 1 < q < ∞) and Hardy space H(X1 × X2) (for 0 < p ≤ 1). As an application,...

Journal: :The American Mathematical Monthly 2012
Ezra Brown Marc Chamberland

= 1 or −1 according as j is or is not a quadratic residue mod p. A multivariable generalization of Theorem 1.1 follows. Theorem 1.1 is a special case of Theorem 1.2 with x3 = · · · = xp = 0. Theorem 1.2. Let p be an odd prime and p = (−1)(p−1)/2p. Then there exist integer polynomials R(x1, x2, . . . , xp) and S(x1, x2, . . . , xp) such that 4 · det(circ(x1, x2, . . . , xp)) x1 + x2 + · · ·+ xp ...

Journal: :Formalized Mathematics 2014
Roland Coghetto

From now on X denotes a set and S denotes a family of subsets of X. Now we state the propositions: (1) Let us consider sets X1, X2, a family S1 of subsets of X1, and a family S2 of subsets of X2. Then {a×b, where a is an element of S1, b is an element of S2 : a ∈ S1 and b ∈ S2} = {s, where s is a subset of X1 ×X2 : there exist sets a, b such that a ∈ S1 and b ∈ S2 and s = a × b}. Proof: {a × b,...

2000
Vladimir Ezhov

This is the Cayley surface when N = 3. The next few are as follows. x4 = x1x3 + 1 2 x2 2 − x1 x2 + 1 4 x1 4 x5 = x1x4 + x2x3 − x1 x3 − x1x2 2 + x1 x2 − 1 5 x1 5 x6 = x1x5 + x2x4 + 1 2 x3 2 − x1 x4 − 2x1x2x3 − 1 3 x2 3 + x1 x3 + 3 2 x1 x2 2 − x1 x2 + 1 6 x1 . Since the first term in (1) is −xN and this is the only occurrence of this variable, these hypersurfaces are polynomial graphs over the re...

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید