In the published article, there was an error in article title. Instead of "Quantitative evaluation Urban Resilience Underdeveloped Regions: A Study Cities along Sichuan-Tibet Railway China", it should be Evaluation Six Sichuan & Tibet, China".The authors apologize for this and state that does not change scientific conclusions any way. The original has been updated.In [Figure 1 updated.

This paper considers Chinese Communist Party policies in Tibet from Confucian, Daoist, and Buddhist perspectives. I first explain how these three traditions are unified the sanjiao heyi, but contend that this practice has been neglected favor of state repression. then elucidate Confucianism, Daoism, Buddhism with respect to their general principles application Tibet. conclude a fuller embrace h...