This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected].

This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected].

This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. David Beacom for assistance and support during the preparation of this dissertation and throughout the writer's graduate career.

Present abstracts of Ph.D dissertations.

The paper considers an approach that allows reducing the subjectivity of experts’ opinions when evaluating dissertations, as well assessing likelihood their completion being successful. is based on using expert evaluation expressed linguistic variables graduate students (adjuncts)’ elaboration depth individual sections dissertations. Following this, analytical model formed, which grounded theor...