A theory of diagnosis and qualitative decision theory are able to formalize reasoning with norms. They are thus diierent from deontic logic, that formalizes reasoning about norms. In this paper, we compare two theories of diagnosis for normative systems: Ramos and Fiadeiro's theory of diagnosis developed for organizational process design and Tan and Van der Torre's theory of diagnosis extended ...

Domain-specific approaches of the Wason selection task (WST) have postulated specifically adapted schemas or Darwinian algorithms and abandoned a normative concept of rationality. We propose a flexible deontic logic theory (FDL theory), which is domain-specific but normative. The test of a prescriptive rule does not involve testing its truth, as in the standard WST, but rather selecting cases i...

Almost every theory of vagueness shares at least one feature: it uses, and in most cases heavily relies on, some kind of normative predicate (or predicates) in its metalanguage. Metalinguistic normative predicates are discussed chiefly by supervaluationists and other defenders of higher-order vagueness. According to this group of theorists, the existence of higher-order vagueness depends on and...

We derive an inter-temporal theory, in the spirit of Kreps and Porteus (1978), of changing tastes and unforeseen contingencies from normative primitives by weakening the completeness axiom of von Neumann and Morgenstern. Our agent can only partially order future decisions, yet desires inter-temporal consistency. Our formulation contrasts with existing literature in several ways: (i) the theory ...

Unplugged is a school-based prevention programme designed and tested in the EU-Dap trial. The programme consists of 12 units delivered by class teachers to adolescents 12-14 years old. It is a strongly interactive programme including a training of personal and social skills with a specific focus on normative beliefs. The aim of this work is to define the theoretical model of the program, the co...

A theory of diagnosis and qualitative decision theory are able to formalize reasoning with norms. They are thus different from deontic logic, that formalizes reasoning about norms. In this paper, we compare two theories of diagnosis for normative systems: Ramos and Fiadeiro’s theory of diagnosis developed for organizational process design and Tan and Van der Torre’s theory of diagnosis extended...

The old adage about putting all of one’s eggs in one basket was thought wise long before the advent of modern portfolio theory and the important results of Markowitz (1959) and others. However, despite the anecdotal imperative to investors to diversify their portfolios, the empirical reality is that diversification rarely takes place as recommended by portfolio theory. In this paper, I demonstr...

Recent research has identified three invariants or identities that appear to hold in people’s probabilistic decision making: the addition law identity, the Bayes rule identity, and the QQ identity (Costello and Watts, 2014, Fisher and Wolfe, 2014, Costello and Watts, 2016b, Wang and Busemeyer, 2013, Wang et al., 2014). Each of these identities represent specific agreement with the requirements ...

In a classic article reviewing the field of planned change, Chin and Benne (1984) outlined three meta-approaches to the implementation of change in social and organizational contexts. These meta-theories of change – Rational-Empirical, Normative-Reeducative, and Power-Coercive – summarized the field of then-existing knowledge related to innovation at a systems level. Chin and Benne’s resulting ...

We extend research on social evaluations and crisis management by explicating the sociocognitive mechanisms that influence how an organization and its external evaluators perceive and respond to the onset of a crisis. Specifically, we highlight the role of social approval—evaluators’ general affinity toward an organization—not only as a critical outcome of crisis management but also as an impor...