In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier's archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is one of the most widely used methods for measuri...

Although explicit measures of doping attitude are widely used, they susceptible to bias due social desirability. The current computerized implicit attitudes time-consuming and based on expensive software solutions. Recently, paper-and-pencil (p&p) Implicit Association Tests (IAT) have been developed, making it possible test several participants simultaneously, anywhere, with no need equipme...

sICH was higher in the IAT group, partial or complete recanalization and good functional outcome at 90 days were significantly higher in this group. The US FDA required a second confirmatory study in order to approve IAT as a standard therapy in AIS. However, for multiple reasons, including the development of the potentially safer and more effective clot retrieval devices, such a study never su...

The autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT; Sartori et al., 2008) is a variant of the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald et al., 1998) that is used to establish whether an autobiographical memory is encoded in the respondent's mind/brain. More specifically, with the aIAT, it is possible to evaluate which one of two autobiographical events is true. The method consists of a compu...

In reporting Implicit Association Test (IAT) results, researchers have most often used scoring conventions described in the first publication of the IAT (A.G. Greenwald, D.E. McGhee, & J.L.K. Schwartz, 1998). Demonstration IATs available on the Internet have produced large data sets that were used in the current article to evaluate alternative scoring procedures. Candidate new algorithms were e...

The Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) consists of two blocks of trials with the same four categories and stimulus-response mappings as the standard IAT, but with 1/3 the number of trials. Unlike the standard IAT, the BIAT focuses the subject on just two of each block's four categories. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that attitude BIATs had satisfactory validity when good (but not bad) wa...

This study concerns the validity and fakability of an integrity-based IAT (the IAT-sp); an adaptation of one developed by Fischer and Bates (2008). Data provide evidence for the assessments validity. While less predictive of deviance, the IAT-sp was found to be significantly less easily faked than an explicit integrity assessment. PRESS PARAGRAPH Employee theft and other counterproductive behav...

McFarland and Crouch (2002) reported substantial positive correlations (a) between the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and response speed and (b) between IATs assessing racism or self-esteem and ostensibly unrelated control IATs. Using an IAT measure in millisecond-difference score format, they concluded that the IAT was confounded with general cognitive ability. A reanalysis of these data usin...

The Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) consists of 2 blocks of trials with the same 4 categories and stimulus-response mappings as the standard IAT, but with 1/3 the number of trials. Unlike the standard IAT, the BIAT focuses the subject on just 2 of each block’s 4 categories. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that attitude BIATs had satisfactory validity when good (but not bad) was a focal ...

BACKGROUND The authors present a procedural extension of the popular Implicit Association Test (IAT) that allows for indirect measurement of attitudes on multiple dimensions (e.g., safe-unsafe; young-old; innovative-conventional, etc.) rather than on a single evaluative dimension only (e.g., good-bad). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In two within-subjects studies, attitudes toward three autom...