The Sarbanes-Oxley Act represented a major legislative action designed to increase transparency and accountability in U.S. corporations. Within the context of agency theory and corporate governance, the expectation is that the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley impacted the agency relationship of firms and hence affected the corporate governance structure. With these changes, the question arises as to...

In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed into law requiring all U.S. based, publicly traded companies to report on the status of their internal controls governing the reporting of financial information. Because of the close relationship between financial reporting and IT, the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act has also greatly impacted IT Governance and the way IT projects are manag...

The financial frauds of recent past have created a lot of attention to financial audits and corporate governance. That attention includes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Act has led to numerous changes in corporate governance. But will the changes affect financial fraud? This research attempts to gather empirical evidence about audit committees, S-OX, and whether the guidelines of S-OX hav...

An extensive finance literature has suggested that independent (outside) directors monitor firm management and thereby increase firm value. Monitoring by a firm’s independent directors is, however, costly and the level of board monitoring should be endogenously determined as a function of firm characteristics. We show that a negative relationship between board monitoring and uncertainty is a di...

=1204442. DUARTE, J.; K. KONG; L. A. YOUNG; AND S. SIEGEL. “Foreign Listings, U.S. Equity Markets, and the Impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 2007. Working paper, University of Washington, 2007. ENGEL, E.; R. M. HAYES; AND X. WANG. “The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and Firms’ Going-Private Decisions.” Journal of Accounting & Economics 44 (2007): 116–45.FAMA, E., AND K. FRENCH. “Common Risk Factors in ...