匈牙利司法编纂的筹备与1791年第十八号法律有关。根据该法成立的法律事务委员会负责起草私法法律草案。这份在两年后完成的草案并不能视为是先进的，直到几十年后的1826年才被印刷出版。绍洛伊·拉斯洛（Szalay László）认为应该遵循的“Code civil”（《法国民法典》）在匈牙利没有被采用。1848年第十五号法律规定的第二次编纂尝试由于政治事件也没有成功。自1853年起，《奥地利普通民法典》在匈牙利和特兰西瓦尼亚生效，因此编纂工作不得不等到1867年的奥匈折衷方案产生后开始。从1895年起，制定一部规范私法、实体法和程序法法典的想法占据了主导地位，时任司法部长埃尔戴·山多尔（Erdély Sándor）成立了负责起草统一民法典草案的委员会。规范民事诉讼和诉讼程序的法典，即1911年第一号法律的制定主要是普洛斯·山多尔（Plósz Sándor）的功绩。在1915年生效的该法典...

We report a laboratory experiment that enables us to study systematically the substantive and procedural rationality of decision making under uncertainty. By using novel graphical representations of budget sets over bundles of state-contingent commodities, we generate a very rich data set well-suited to studying behavior at the level of the individual subject. We test the data for consistency w...

In Pretext in Peril, Professor Martin examines the interplay between procedural and substantive law in disparate treatment cases in which plaintiffs offer circumstantial evidence – evidence of pretext – as opposed to direct evidence to maintain their employment discrimination claims. Pretext constitutes an evidentiary showing that the defendant’s asserted reason for an adverse employment action...

Procedural norms are instrumental norms addressed to agents playing a role in the normative system, for example to motivate these role playing agents to recognize violations or to apply sanctions. Procedural norms have first been discussed in law, where they address legal practitioners such as legislators, lawyers and policemen, but they are discussed now too in normative multiagent systems to ...

procedural acts may be invalid because of formal or substantial irregularity. in french procedural law, we can see a distinction between invalidity of instruments owning to formal irregularity and invalidity of documents by reason of essential defect; a distinction that affects the nature and plea time and the subsequent regularization of document. formal invalidity must be expressly provided i...