Abstract The aim of this paper is to argue in favor the view that some counterpossibles are false. This done indirectly by showing accepting opposite view, i.e., one ascribes truth each and every counterpossible, results claim necessarily false theory has exactly same consequences. Accordingly, it shown taking counterpossible be true not only undermines value debates over various alternative th...

• Type I error, also known as a “false positive”: the error of rejecting a null hypothesis when it is actually true. In other words, this is the error of accepting an alternative hypothesis (the real hypothesis of interest) when the results can be attributed to chance. Plainly speaking, it occurs when we are observing a difference when in truth there is none (or more specifically no statistical...

Ioannidis estimated that most published research findings are false, but he did not indicate when, if at all, potentially false research results may be considered as acceptable to society. We combined our two previously published models to calculate the probability above which research findings may become acceptable. A new model indicates that the probability above which research results should...

What makes a proposition true or false has traditionally played an essential role in philosophical and linguistic theories of meaning. A comprehensive neurobiological theory of language must ultimately be able to explain the combined contributions of real-world truth-value and discourse context to sentence meaning. This fMRI study investigated the neural circuits that are sensitive to the propo...