Contextualists of David Lewis’ stripe endorse the thesis that ‘know’ and its cognates are context dependent so as to heed their infallibilist intuitions while avoiding skepticism. I argue that the plausibility of infallibilism can be explained away as arising from two other intuitively known facts, i.e.: (KA) For any speaker, A, and proposition, p, if A asserts that p, then A incurs a commitmen...