In the definition of a crossed module $(T,G,rho)$, the actions of the group $T$ and $G$ on themselves are given by conjugation. In this paper, we consider these actions to be arbitrary and thus generalize the concept of ordinary crossed module. Therefore, we get the category ${bf GCM}$, of all generalized crossed modules and generalized crossed module morphisms between them, and investigate som...

The main goal of this paper is to classify ?-module categories for the SO(3)2m modular tensor category. This done by classifying nimrep graphs and cell systems, in process we also SO(3) invariants. There are module type A, E their conjugates, but there no orbifold (or D) categories. We present a construction subfactor with principal graph given fusion rules fundamental generator introduce Frobe...

 Let $R$ be a ring‎, ‎and let $n‎, ‎d$ be non-negative integers‎. ‎A right $R$-module $M$ is called $(n‎, ‎d)$-projective if $Ext^{d+1}_R(M‎, ‎A)=0$ for every $n$-copresented right $R$-module $A$‎. ‎$R$ is called right $n$-cocoherent if every $n$-copresented right $R$-module is $(n+1)$-coprese-nted‎, ‎it is called a right co-$(n,d)$-ring if every right $R$-module is $(n‎, ‎d)$-projective‎. ‎$R$...

in this paper, we extend some propositions of banachalgebras into module actions and establish the relationships betweentopological centers of module actions. we introduce some newconcepts as                         -property and -property for banach modules and obtain some conclusions inthe topological center of module actions and arens regularity of banachalgebras.

in this paper, we  study the arens regularity properties of module actions. we investigate some properties of topological centers of module actions ${z}^ell_{b^{**}}(a^{**})$ and  ${z}^ell_{a^{**}}(b^{**})$ with some conclusions in group algebras.

In this paper we study the relation between module amenability of $theta$-Lau product $A×_theta B$ and that of Banach algebras $A, B$. We also discuss module biprojectivity of $A×theta B$. As a consequent we will see that for an inverse semigroup $S$, $l^1(S)×_theta l^1(S)$ is module amenable if and only if $S$ is amenable.

Let g be a finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebra over C, and let U be the qanalogue of its universal enveloping algebra defined by Drinfel’d [3] and Jimbo [5]. According to [7, 3.5.6, 6.2.3 & 6.3.4], for each dominant weight λ in the weight lattice of g there is an irreducible, finite-dimensional highest weight U -module V (λ) with highest weight λ. Kashiwara [6] and Lusztig [7, 14.4.12] ha...