The 34-million-year (My) interval of the Late Triassic is marked by the formation of several large impact structures on Earth. Late Triassic impact events have been considered a factor in biotic extinction events in the Late Triassic (e.g., end-Triassic extinction event), but this scenario remains controversial because of a lack of stratigraphic records of ejecta deposits. Here, we report evide...

The Permo-Triassic archosauromorph record is crucial to understand the impact of the Permo-Triassic mass extinction on the early evolution of the group and its subsequent dominance in Mesozoic terrestrial ecosystems. However, the Permo-Triassic archosauromorph record is still very poor in most continents and hampers the identification of global macroevolutionary patterns. Here we describe crani...

Abstract Triassic strata in the Greater Barents Sea Basin are important records of geodynamic activity surrounding catchments and sediment transport Arctic basins. This study is first attempt to investigate evolution these source areas through time. Our analysis budgets from subsurface data application BQART approach estimate catchment properties shows that (1) during Lower Triassic, supply was...

A detailed magnetostratigraphic study, linked to a new latest Permian U–Pb ID-TIMS age, was undertaken on the continental Shichuanhe section (SCH) in North China order provide magnetic polarity scale for Late Permian–early Middle Triassic interval. Tilt-corrected mean directions of characteristic remanent magnetization pass reversal test and correspond site paleolatitude 18.1°N during Early Tri...

Horacek et al. (2021) commented on our publication arguing that we used an incorrect biochronology to define the Permian-Triassic (PT) boundary and this inaccurate definition resulted in erroneous interpretation of oxygen isotope record studied Chanakhchi (former Sovestashen) section. Their comment gives us opportunity discuss depth identification PT address some flawed arguments