نتایج جستجو برای: specific modeling prognosis percutaneous coronary intervention
تعداد نتایج: 1903045 فیلتر نتایج به سال:
I would want the radial approach by an experienced person. –Dr Robert M. Califf, MD Vice Chancellor for Clinical and Translational Research, Director of the Duke Translational Medicine Institute, Professor of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, when asked about his own preferences should he ever need a percutaneous coronary intervention as told to Dr Adolph M. Hutt...
Stent thrombosis as a complication of percutaneous coronary intervention frequently is associated with deadly events such as myocardial infarction and sudden death. Definitions of stent thrombosis have not been in a uniform manner in different clinical studies. Two episodes of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction nearly two years after implanting a drug – eluting stent in a 58-year-...
atients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) have a worse prognosis than any other form of coronary artery disease (CAD). During the past decade, the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for LMCA have been major topics for both interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons. CABG has been considered as...
Coronary artery perforation is a rare and dangerous complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Its consequences may range from minimal dye staining of the pericardial cavity to haemodynamic collapse, and it requires urgent treatment. Nearly half of cases occur due to the use of stiff and hydrophilic guidewires. Perforations due to stent deployment or strut rupture are seen more rarely,...
Coronary artery perforation is a rare and dangerous complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Its consequences may range from minimal dye staining of the pericardial cavity to haemodynamic collapse, and it requires urgent treatment. Nearly half of cases occur due to the use of stiff and hydrophilic guidewires. Perforations due to stent deployment or strut rupture are seen more rarely,...
More than 30 years ago, thrombotic occlusion of a coronary artery was identified as the pathophysiological mechanism causing myocardial infarction (1). Mechanical and/or thrombolytic reperfusion has subsequently become the standard of care for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, reperfusion of the epicardial coronary artery does not guarantee reperfusion a...
There are evidence-based guidelines for staging of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but we are not aware of any evidence comparing the strategy of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention in the index admission versus the strategy of staging in a subsequent admission for patients with coronary artery diseas...
Same-day percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a reality with modern interventional equipment and pharmaceutical agents. Elective PCI is rarely an inpatient procedure and is now predominantly considered an outpatient procedure. Approaches to safely manage elective patients through same-day PCI have been well described in the literature and demonstrate no safety signal compared with overni...
The number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is increasing worldwide. Follow-up strategies after PCI are extremely heterogeneous and can greatly affect the cost of medical care. Of note, clinical evaluations and non-invasive exams are often performed to low risk patients. In the present consensus document, practical advises are provided with respect to a tailored follow-up strategy o...
نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال
با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید