This derivation of (2) is not valid, because this duality applies to inferences and theorems only, not to definitions. In fact, (1) should be treated as an axiom. Accordingly, the duality of Lemma 3.3.1 would not be valid until the dual (2) of (1) is proved independently, as we do below. Our new proof will make use of Proposition 3.3.3, the original proof of which is based on duality. So, we mu...

Answering a recent question posed by Gregori, Morillas and Sapena (“On a class of completable fuzzy metric spaces”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161 (2010), 2193–2205) we present two examples of non strong fuzzy metrics (in the sense of George and Veeramani).

Let A be anm×n binary matrix, t ∈ {1, . . . ,m} be a threshold, and ε > 0 be a positive parameter. We show that given a family of O(n) maximal t-frequent column sets for A, it is NP-complete to decide whether A has any further maximal t-frequent sets, or not, even when the number of such additional maximal t-frequent column sets may be exponentially large. In contrast, all minimal t-infrequent ...