this article considers all the mulla sadra’s proofs of primacy of existence (asalat al-wujud) found in all his works‚ and concludes that sadra has two approaches in his arguments: (1) to prove the primacy of existence through negation of original attributes from quiddity (mahiyyah), (2) to refute the primacy of quiddity through indirect proof. at the end‚ we conclude that the first approach and...

In the Islamic tradition, Mulla Sadra is foremost among the philosophers who have dealt with the issue of prophecy from all three theological, philosophical, and mystical perspectives. Among Western scholars of religion, Henry Corbin is the most prominent commentator of prophetic wisdom, who has provided a mystical reading of the problem of prophecy drawing on the ideas of Muslim philosophers. ...

Substantial motion is Mulla Sadra's philosophical innovation in material existence. Since the four fundamental interactions are major topics of physics, this comparative study, substantial tested based on physical achievements. The study aimed to find answers following questions: do achievements made physics strengthen or weaken theory motion? If science strengthens it, which examples Based res...

The purpose of this article is to review the main concepts Mulla Sadra’s philosophy. These ideas are foundation Al-Hikmah Al-Muta'alliyah group philosophy theory. This philosophy, along with Al-Masya'iyyah and Al-Isyraqiyah, one three major groups in Islamic study used a descriptive analysis. author reviews work Sadra, namely fil Al-Sysfar 'Aqliyah Arba'ah another book, Al-Masya'ir. Secondary r...

one of the consequences of accepting personal unity of existence as well as the philosophical rule of “al-wahid” is wujud-e munbasit (the extended existence). sayyid haydar amuli explains origination of multiplicity from the one on the basis of wujud-e munbasit. according to him the first emanation from being is universal and extendedand contains all degrees of contingent world. by depicting of...

although aristotle has considered the “universal substance” as a substance, he introduced knowledge as an accident. the question then arises as to whether a “universal substance”, whereas it is a substance, can be an accident. answering the question, ibn sina has changed the subject of the dispute from “mental substance” to “quiddity of substance”, so that he could guarantee its truth in the fo...