Recent findings of authorship criteria violations in the manuscripts submitted to Biochemia Medica show that almost 40% of authors do not meet necessary criteria for authorship and thus indicate the need for better dissemination of editorial policy on authorship in our journal. We believe that such cases are mostly due to the authors’ unawareness or the lack of understanding of the authorship c...

The aim of this paper is to explore the usefulness of using features from different linguistic levels to email authorship identification. Using various email datasets provided by PAN’11 lab we tested several feature groups in both authorship attribution and authorship verification subtasks. The selected feature groups combined with Regularized Logistic Regression and One-Class SVMmachine learni...

In the 1970s, a co-authorship network in the field of Simulation Optimization of supply chains was established, supported by local associations. Then, the development of this network was favored by the foundation of new co-authorships and the consolidation of already existing. The purpose of this study is to analyze the structure, collaboration patterns and the time-evolution of the co-authorsh...

Collaborative writing in academic medicine gives rise to more richly informed scholarship, and yet challenging ethical issues surrounding authorship are commonly encountered. International guidelines on authorship help clarify whether individuals who have contributed to a completed scholarly work have been correctly included as authors, but these guidelines do not facilitate intentional and pro...

Automatic identification of authorship in disputed documents has benefited from complex network theory as this approach does not require human expertise or detailed semantic knowledge. Networks modeling entire books can be used to discriminate texts from different sources and understand network growth mechanisms, but only a few studies have probed the suitability of networks in modeling small c...