نتایج جستجو برای: systematic reviews

تعداد نتایج: 368907  

Journal: :Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 2013
Karl D A Huchzermeyer

How to cite this book review: How to cite this book review: Huchzermeyer K.D.A., 2013, 'Book review: Ziekten van vissen, schaal-, en schelpdieren, van belang voor de Nederlandse aquacultuur'84(1), Art. #1016, 1 page.http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v84i1.1016.

Journal: :iranian journal of neurology 0
narjes hazar department of community medicine, school of medicine, tehran university of medical ‎sciences, tehran, iran leila seddigh department of community medicine, school of medicine, tehran university of medical ‎sciences, tehran, iran zahra rampisheh department of community medicine, school of medicine, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran‎ marzieh nojomi department of community medicine, school of medicine, preventive medicine and public health research center, iran university of ‎medical sciences, tehran, iran

background: alzheimer’s disease (ad) is the most common type of dementia. demonstrating the modifiable risk factors of ad can help to plan for prevention of this disease. the aim of the current review was to characterize modifiable cardiovascular risk factors of ad using existing data and determine their contribution in ad development in iran and the world. methods: the systematic search was do...

2015
Holger J Schünemann Lorenzo Moja

Systematic reviews Systematic reviews are scientific investigations, with preplanned methods and an assembly of original studies as their “subjects” [1,2]. They synthesize the results of multiple primary investigations by using strategies that limit bias and random error [1,2]. Systematic reviews are transparent about how studies were identified and which were included or excluded, the risk of ...

Atefeh Davoudian, Farid Zayeri, Hamid Soori, Maryam Kazerani,

Background: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have significant advantages over conventional reviews in that all available data should be presented.  This study aimed to evaluate Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis abstracts indexed in WOS and Scopus during 2003-2012 based on PRISMA checklist.    Methods: This is an analytical study. We evaluated 46 article abstracts ...

2014
Katharina F. Mueller Matthias Briel Daniel Strech Joerg J. Meerpohl Britta Lang Edith Motschall Viktoria Gloy Francois Lamontagne Dirk Bassler

BACKGROUND Systematic reviews of preclinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical research and thus even clinical care. Dissemination bias, selective dissemination of positive or significant results, is one of the major threats to validity in systematic reviews also in the realm of animal studies. We conducted a systematic review to determine the number of p...

ژورنال: پژوهش در پزشکی 2010
عزیزی, فریدون, ملبوس باف، , رامین,

Abstract Background: Successful clinical decisions are the outcome of a complex process. In making them, we draw on information from scientific evidences, our personal experience and external rules and constraints. Considering that the explosive increase in the amount and quality of the scientific evidence that has come from both the laboratory bench and the bedside, we may lack the time, mo...

Journal: :iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research 0
mina iravani mohsen janghorbani elahe zarean masoud bahrami

abstract background: despite the scientific and medical advances for management of complicated health issues, the current maternity care setting has increased risks for healthy women and their babies. the aim of this study was to conduct an overview of published systematic reviews on the interventions used most commonly for management of normal labor and delivery in the first stage of labor. ma...

Journal: :BMC Medicine 2003
Victor M Montori Nancy L Wilczynski Douglas Morgan R Brian Haynes

BACKGROUND Systematic reviews summarize all pertinent evidence on a defined health question. They help clinical scientists to direct their research and clinicians to keep updated. Our objective was to determine the extent to which systematic reviews are clustered in a large collection of clinical journals and whether review type (narrative or systematic) affects citation counts. METHODS We us...

نمودار تعداد نتایج جستجو در هر سال

با کلیک روی نمودار نتایج را به سال انتشار فیلتر کنید