Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees’ comments. Little guidance is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to notice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maxim...

the objective of the present paper is to shed some light on peer feedback in efl writing courses. in recent years, with regard to teaching writing, there has been a total shift of approach, from product-orientation to process-orientation. a key component of the latter is peer assessment in which learners read each other's compositions and provide feedback to the writer, based on the teache...

Abstract All papers published in this volume have been reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted expert referees to professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal IOP Publishing. • Type peer review: Single Anonymous Conference submission management system: Morressier Number submissions received: 60 sent for 50 accepted: 31 Acceptance...