(a) larger sample size so that the result is more precise, appropriate subgroup analysis is more feasible, and there is a lower risk of an apparently "negative" result when the treatment is, in truth, effective; (b) quicker results before people lose scientific and commercial interest in the treatment and before it is modified or the theoretical indications for it are changed; (c) wider dissemi...

Very often statisticians have to deal with the problem of sample size calculation. However this is one of the most difficult questions to be answered since it depends on many considerations, assumptions and restrictions on the real problem being solved. In this paper we develop some methods, based on credible intervals, to calculate sample sizes for proportions and correlations.

We simulated multistate capture histories (CHs) by varying state survival (ϕ), detection (p) and transition (ψ), number of total capture occasions and releases per capture occasion and then modified these scenarios to mimic false rejection error (FRE), a common misidentification error, resulting from the failure to match samples of the same individual. We then fit a multistate model and estimat...

We developed a new analytic proof and conducted Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of methodological and statistical artifacts on the relative accuracy of intercept- and slope-based test bias assessment. The main simulation design included 3,185,000 unique combinations of a wide range of values for true intercept- and slope-based test bias, total sample size, proportion of minority g...

The problem of sample size determination based on three commonly used non-parametric rank based tests, namely, one-sample Wilcoxon's rank sum test, two-sample's Wilcoxon's rank sum test, and the rank-based test for independence is studied. Explicit formulas for variabilities of the test statistics under the alternative hypotheses are derived. Consequently, close forms of power functions of thes...

While manual tracing is the method of choice in measuring hippocampal volume, its time intensive nature and proneness to human error make automated methods attractive, especially when applied to large samples. Few studies have systematically compared the performance of the two techniques. In this study, we measured hippocampal volumes in a large (N = 403) population-based sample of individuals ...