Abstract Relying on inference to the best explanation (IBE) requires one hold intuition that world is ‘intelligible’, is, such states of affairs at least generally have explanations for their obtaining. I argue metaphysical naturalists are rationally required withhold this intuition, unless they cease be naturalists. This because all plausible naturalistic aetiologies entail and state which it ...

Science and Faith in Dialogue presents a cogent, compelling case for concordance between science theism. The term theism refers, this book, to the belief God's existence. Within theology, is often used convey range of presuppositions about nature attributes God. Based on scientific natural theological perspectives, two pillars theology are revisited: Cosmological Argument from Design. book argu...

Science and Faith in Dialogue presents a cogent, compelling case for concordance between science theism. The term theism refers, this book, to the belief God's existence. Within theology, is often used convey range of presuppositions about nature attributes God. Based on scientific natural theological perspectives, two pillars theology are revisited: Cosmological Argument from Design. book argu...

Pain and suffering are prima facie bad things. They are widespread. So the traditional argument against theism (the argument from evil) starts with them. Defendants of God’s goodness either have to explain why there is evil (i.e. offer a theodicy) or have at least to show that the argument from evil has no force against theism. Alvin Pantinga (1985) distinguishes between offering a (positive) t...