belief in the lack of authority of ‘a single report’ is one of the most basic doctrines of ibn idrīs in the principles of jurisprudence, and this same issue has caused his ideas and methods of jurisprudence to be different from those of other jurists, and even in some cases has led to irregularity and scarcity. he does not consider as authentic those traditions that have not reached frequency (...

The judicial pronouncements of the case Prosecutor v. Bemba have been first decisions International Criminal Court in matters responsibility for omission superior (article 28 Rome Statute). Although this jurisprudence has meant end some problems raised by scholarly doctrine international criminal Law, many other issues left unsolved. After a review facts and its decisions, paper proposes an int...

The judicial pronouncements of the case Prosecutor v. Bemba have been first decisions International Criminal Court in matters responsibility for omission superior (article 28 Rome Statute). Although this jurisprudence has meant end some problems raised by scholarly doctrine international criminal Law, many other issues left unsolved. After a review facts and its decisions, paper proposes an int...

The aim of the article is theoretical and legal coverage key parameters methodological tools in scientific knowledge digitalization state power, which proposed to be carried out on basis synthesis achievements general jurisprudence, branch sciences, related social sciences. structure methodology research power consists seven "levels" located principle hierarchy subordination offered: 1) dominan...

the legal and juridical pathology of end-al-estetaah (payable in case of affordability) condition in  mahriyeh (dowry) maryam aghaei bejestani [1] mohammad rohani mogaddam [2] jalal araghi [3]   abstract dowry as one of the aspects of marriage contract has been canonized to consolidate foundation of the family and prove man’s interest to the continuation family life. dowry division into end-al-...

This article analyses the recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the issue of domestic violence, with a particular focus on Valiuliene v Lithuania. It seems that to date the Court’s jurisprudence on this issue is somewhat inconsistent, and with Valiuliene v Lithuania the Court was given an opportunity to clarify its approach in this area. There are certainly a number of p...

Clinicians in sex offender treatment programs are required to resolve the ethical dilemmas, which invariably arise in this sort of work, by breaching traditional mental health ethical principles such as maintaining confidentiality and promoting patient autonomy. Indeed the mark of a “good” therapist is their primary focus on the protection of the community rather than on the interests of the of...