Journal:
:anesthesiology and pain medicine
0
gholamreza movasseghi department of anesthesiology, shahid hamsheminejad hospital, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran
valiollah hassani minimally invasive surgery research center, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran; department of anesthesiology and critical care, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran
mahmood reza mohaghegh department of anesthesiology, shahid hamsheminejad hospital, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran
reza safaeian department of anesthesiology and critical care, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran
saeid safari department of anesthesiology and critical care, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran
mohammad mahdi zamani department of anesthesiology and critical care, iran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran
conclusions it seems that, in patients undergoing pncl, sa is as effective and safe as ga. patients who undergo pncl under sa require smaller amounts of analgesic dose and show hemodynamic stability during surgery and recovery time. also, sa technique provides decreased blood loss and shortened surgery as well as anesthesia times compared to ga. results map and heart rate show no significant di...