There is a debate on the nature of ignorance in contemporary epistemology. The standard view holds that lack knowledge, while new contends true belief. Rather than taking side this dispute, Pritchard recently offers proposal according to which essentially involves not just absence certain epistemic good, but also an intellectual failing inquiry. We argue Pritchard’s advances discussion by incor...

Several philosophers have recently advanced wager-based arguments for the existence of irreducibly normative truths or against nihilism. Here I consider whether these would cause a Pyrrhonian skeptic to lose her skepticism. conclude they not do so directly. However, if prompted different decision problem, which call normativity wager skeptics, be motivated attempt act in accordance with any rea...

Abstract Many moral error theorists reject realism on the grounds that implies existence of categorical normativity, yet normativity does not exist. Call this Metaphysical Argument. In response, some realists have emphasized a parity between and epistemic normativity. They argue if one kind is rejected, then both must be rejected. Therefore, cannot theorist without also being an theorist. Parit...